Peter's poems cross landscapes with culture. Information is puzzled out thru the ear where he has somehow unhooked -- to see.
To see, look here! Hat tip to D - thanks.
Monday, April 13, 2015
Saturday, April 11, 2015
Refusal to keep accounts
If communism is in large part a refusal to keep accounts, then one could make a case for a less narrative poetics, i.e., not obsessed with its own(ed) accounts?
We too easily forget that "these" 3 bananas do not equal "those" 3 bananas? The abstraction of number doesn't work well with Plato's idea - ideal image of what stands behind appointed objects.
In other words, the particular/concrete doesn't have universal equivalents? Money is inherently abstract.
It is amusing that the etymology of philanthropy is very much the same as the etymology of philanderer. The etymology = Love + (hu)man.
Not sure what money has to do with it? Are these two different aspects or articulations of the economy of excess: one emphasizing accumulation and the other emphasizing expenditure?
Do philanthropists necessarily embrace the anthropocene? No. I think the philanthropist loves the genre /abstraction of man - and pays tribute. Philanderers love specific instances of the human - and they spend themselves- directly throwing themselves at and into the lives/bodies of these specific humans.
The antidote to the patriarchy packed into these two ugly terms may be 'polyandry'?
If I could tell a joke it would start: these three bananas walked into a bar...
We too easily forget that "these" 3 bananas do not equal "those" 3 bananas? The abstraction of number doesn't work well with Plato's idea - ideal image of what stands behind appointed objects.
In other words, the particular/concrete doesn't have universal equivalents? Money is inherently abstract.
It is amusing that the etymology of philanthropy is very much the same as the etymology of philanderer. The etymology = Love + (hu)man.
Not sure what money has to do with it? Are these two different aspects or articulations of the economy of excess: one emphasizing accumulation and the other emphasizing expenditure?
Do philanthropists necessarily embrace the anthropocene? No. I think the philanthropist loves the genre /abstraction of man - and pays tribute. Philanderers love specific instances of the human - and they spend themselves- directly throwing themselves at and into the lives/bodies of these specific humans.
The antidote to the patriarchy packed into these two ugly terms may be 'polyandry'?
If I could tell a joke it would start: these three bananas walked into a bar...
from Bartleby for Peter Culley
Remember leisure poets who invert the body’s response? They yield to an earlier image, back when fruit dots were candies of the gods. A twilit lozenge in the wake of dawn’s burst. Dispatched to that suckling place – a pure exposure or announcement before skin. That’s the ticket, pleased to admit one. A baby shower that delivers a pillar from the waif. Advertisements followed by popcorn and sticky feet. The Magi caught looking can’t get enough. Dead letters arrive just in time.
Friday, April 3, 2015
Welcome to the Philanthropocene
defacto loss leaders
breastless spigot
for honeyed image
for brute
philanderer
with the monied eyes
my other glasses
emerald wides
recharged on the grid
keep their own accounts
narrative loss
prevention
write it down
breastless spigot
for honeyed image
for brute
philanderer
with the monied eyes
my other glasses
emerald wides
recharged on the grid
keep their own accounts
narrative loss
prevention
write it down
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)